GREEN COVE SPRINGS – The Board of County Commissioners filed its response to an order to show cause filed by the school board. Now it’s up to a judge to figure out whether the school board can …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continueDon't have an ID?Print subscribersIf you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one. Non-subscribersClick here to see your options for subscribing. Single day passYou also have the option of purchasing 24 hours of access, for $1.00. Click here to purchase a single day pass. |
GREEN COVE SPRINGS – The Board of County Commissioners filed its response to an order to show cause filed by the school board. Now it’s up to a judge to figure out whether the school board can force the BCC to set a special election for a half-cent sales tax to raise more than $300 million for school maintenance projects.
After being ordered by the court to “show cause” for why it didn’t grant the school board’s request for a special election, County Attorney Courtney Grimm filed a 50-page response, saying the commission acted within its rights.
At the core of the lawsuit is Florida Statute 212.055(6)(b).
“As a result, the duties granted to the BCC allow the BCC when placing the referendum on the ballot, to determine the election on which to place the proposition,” Grimm said.
Grimm said that the governing body of a given county is responsible to place a sales surtax on the ballot. She also said the school board contended with no statutory or legal support that the BCC is required to place the sales tax referendum on a ballot and place it on the ballot for a special election with a date set by the school board.
“The BCC, however, determined that the application of the rules of statutory construction do not allow for the insertion of additional requirement into the statute which the School Board seeks to impose and that the words of the statute must be given their plain meaning,” Grimm said.
Grimm called the use of the word “required” by the school board “perplexing.”
Grimm said contrary to the school board’s claim, the BCC did not refuse to create a special election, but instead exercised its lawful discretion by requesting that the school board revise their request to ask that the referendum be placed on the November 2020 general election.
Recently-signed House Bill 5 will eliminate the use of special elections to raise taxes. That law will go into effect on Jan. 1, so the school board is trying to get ahead of that deadline by getting the referendum in front of voters in less than five months.